Our NGO, "Happy Eating" is a group which supports to increase the number or services for vegetarians in 2020, the Olympic year because at that time, Tokyo will be full of foreign tourists and many athletes and when they come into the city of Tokyo, some people might have trouble finding what they could eat because of being a vegetarian.
In order to have more people interested in vegetarians, we will try to make vegetarian products and sell them in convenience stores. Also, we are thinking of collaborating with convenience store companies like 7-Eleven , LAWSON, or Family Mart, for increasing the products of healthy vegetarian foods.
We recruit members through Internet, and after the products are sold in convenience stores, we will recruit more members by sticking our website QR code on the package of the products.
So next, I'd like to look at the feedback of our presentation.
The numbers are the average of the points.
Appropriateness of the name: 4.14
Importance of the goals and missions: 3.53
Uniqueness of the group: 3.75
Sufficiency of fundraising: 4.00
Methods adequateness: 3.67
Persuasion to our audience: 3.80
Quality of our power point: 3.21
It seems that the audience thought the name of our NGO are nice, but the quality of the PPT wasn't so good. According to the comments, Shorten the presentation regarding our survey results and it would be better. I should have cooperated and exchange thoughts more earlier with my partner making the slideshow.
Some comments say that our mission was really unique and there will be tons of people who would support our activity. I think vegetarian people exist a lot in the world and they would love to have more vegetarian services, and there is few groups that has similar missions with us, so a lot of people will know about us and we could have a many of supporters.